Immigrants from Central America vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,336,169 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $44,479, a difference of 27.2%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $105,444, a difference of 24.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $98,886, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $56,052, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $62,766, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.5%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.1%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (68.3% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 31.3%), no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 57.1%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.2%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.5%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 6.4%).