Chickasaw vs Peruvian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Peruvian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Peruvians
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,786
SOCIAL INDEX
55.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
168th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Peruvian Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,882,116 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.666. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.755% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 755.3 Peruvians.
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $90,261, a difference of 28.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $105,070, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $98,886, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.1%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $55,659, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $62,766, a difference of 16.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,479 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Excellent $105,444 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $90,261 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Excellent $47,628 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Good $55,659 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Good $40,234 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $56,052 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Exceptional $98,886 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $105,070 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Excellent $62,766 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.6% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.1%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 38.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.4%), and receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Excellent 11.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 10.7% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Excellent 15.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Excellent 15.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Fair 5.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 11.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 13.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Average 11.7% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Fair 5.3% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Average 5.3% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Fair 17.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Average 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Fair 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Poor 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 34.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Poor 74.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.6% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.3%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.080%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Fair 6.5% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 31.5% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 13.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Fair 55.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Average 19.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 34.1%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.19%), high school diploma (88.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.4% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.4% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.1% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.2% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.8% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Poor 64.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 38.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.3% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Peruvian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 63.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 63.4%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.3%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Peruvian |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Fair 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Excellent 46.8% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |