Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,793,148 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.170% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 169.9 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $56,052, a difference of 6.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,876 compared to $98,886, a difference of 6.5%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $90,261, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,464 compared to $44,479, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $40,234, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.86%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 6.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 5.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.25%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and bachelor's degree (36.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 8.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%).