Arapaho vs Peruvian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,725,157 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.500. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Peruvians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 30.8 Peruvians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $105,070, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $98,886, a difference of 37.9%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,479, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $62,766, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $56,052, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 86.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 55.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.48%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.2%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 153.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 134.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 133.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.5%, a difference of 49.5%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.97%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.30, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 53.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 34.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 56.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.35%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Peruvian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 52.8%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 52.0%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.99%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 6.3%).