Immigrants from Caribbean vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,498,573 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.353. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 3.1 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($83,319 compared to $104,488, a difference of 25.4%), per capita income ($37,254 compared to $45,854, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $59,683, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $53,256, a difference of 4.9%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $41,872, a difference of 15.0%), and wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 53.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 37.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.3%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 25.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.36%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (65.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 39.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.0%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.5%).