Luxembourger vs Moroccan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Moroccan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Moroccans

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,626
SOCIAL INDEX
33.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
215th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Moroccan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,862,046 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.060. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 11.0 Moroccans.
Luxembourger Integration in Moroccan Communities

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 14.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $53,256, a difference of 5.7%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $41,872, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($86,418 compared to $86,468, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $56,499, a difference of 0.35%), and per capita income ($45,663 compared to $45,854, a difference of 0.42%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$45,854
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Good
$104,488
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Good
$86,468
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$48,838
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Excellent
$56,499
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Exceptional
$41,872
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$53,256
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Good
$96,117
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Average
$100,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Fair
$59,683
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
24.0%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.2%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 39.7%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.70%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Fair
13.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
18.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
17.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Average
21.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Fair
29.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
12.8%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.6%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.8%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 7.7%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.8%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Average
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 26.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Poor
35.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Poor
82.5%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 18.4%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.28%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.3% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.2%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
61.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Average
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Average
31.8%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 173.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 11.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 31.5%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
14.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
85.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
48.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
15.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.9%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.8%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Fair
88.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Average
65.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Good
60.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Excellent
48.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
40.5%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
16.8%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%

Luxembourger vs Moroccan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.7%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.3%), male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Luxembourger vs Moroccan Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerMoroccan
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Average
23.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.5%