Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,536,988 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $100,138, a difference of 24.0%), median household income ($106,057 compared to $86,468, a difference of 22.7%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $53,256, a difference of 8.6%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $41,872, a difference of 10.6%), and per capita income ($52,660 compared to $45,854, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 44.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother poverty (25.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 20.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 28.8%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and married-couple households (50.6% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.11%), family households (66.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 71.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.6%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.6%).