Immigrants from South America vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,912,281 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to an increase of 1.7 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $41,872, a difference of 5.6%), median earnings ($46,548 compared to $48,838, a difference of 4.9%), and median male earnings ($53,962 compared to $56,499, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $59,683, a difference of 0.90%), median household income ($85,611 compared to $86,468, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,126 compared to $100,138, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.58%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 10.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in family households (65.6% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 0.49%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.5%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 10.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.6%).