Immigrants from Russia vs Moroccan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,965,459 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Moroccans within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Moroccans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to a decrease of 5.9 Moroccans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,044 compared to $45,854, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $96,117, a difference of 13.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $100,138, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $53,256, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $41,872, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $59,683, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 21.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.74%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.7%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (63.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.2%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Moroccan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.3%).