Chickasaw vs Menominee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Menominee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Menominee
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Menominee Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,666,423 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 21.7 Menominee.
Chickasaw vs Menominee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.6%), median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $42,581, a difference of 12.3%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $37,884, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $33,894, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $79,358, a difference of 1.8%), and median household income ($70,005 compared to $68,423, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Tragic $34,578 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Tragic $79,563 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Tragic $68,423 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Tragic $37,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Tragic $42,581 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Tragic $33,894 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Tragic $47,907 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Tragic $79,358 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Tragic $76,903 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Tragic $51,719 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.6%), single female poverty (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 16.4% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Tragic 17.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Tragic 23.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Tragic 25.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Tragic 27.8% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Tragic 37.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 17.2% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 120.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 67.2%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Tragic 11.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Poor 5.6% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Tragic 60.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Tragic 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 68.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 77.4% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 53.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (64.4% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.30, a difference of 3.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Tragic 42.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Tragic 42.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Tragic 51.1% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 17.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.5%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.080%), and 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.12%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 91.9% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 57.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Tragic 50.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 10.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Chickasaw vs Menominee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (15.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.4%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Menominee |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Tragic 2.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 52.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 2.8% |