Lithuanian vs Menominee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Menominee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Menominee

Excellent
Fair
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Menominee Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,850,341 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.342. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 46.6 Menominee.
Lithuanian Integration in Menominee Communities

Lithuanian vs Menominee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $76,903, a difference of 46.3%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $79,563, a difference of 45.0%), and median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $42,581, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $47,907, a difference of 11.8%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $33,894, a difference of 24.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $51,719, a difference of 26.1%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Income
Income MetricLithuanianMenominee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$34,578
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Tragic
$79,563
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Tragic
$68,423
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$37,884
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$42,581
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$33,894
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Tragic
$47,907
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Tragic
$79,358
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Tragic
$76,903
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Tragic
$51,719
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Exceptional
22.7%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 80.5%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 77.9%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 77.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.090%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.2%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianMenominee
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
18.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
23.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
25.0%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
27.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
16.8%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
37.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
17.2%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 123.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 72.1%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianMenominee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
11.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.6%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 6.6%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianMenominee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
60.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
33.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Tragic
68.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
77.4%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.7%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 73.0%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 68.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (64.0% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianMenominee
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Exceptional
66.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.30
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
9.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
42.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
51.1%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 39.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 17.2%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianMenominee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Tragic
17.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Tragic
5.0%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 74.1%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 73.5%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 66.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianMenominee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
57.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
50.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
36.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Lithuanian vs Menominee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 47.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.0%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.5%).
Lithuanian vs Menominee Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianMenominee
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
52.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.8%