Pima vs Menominee Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Menominee
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Menominee
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,175
SOCIAL INDEX
29.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
229th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Menominee Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,302,680 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 26.043% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 26,043.1 Menominee.
Pima vs Menominee Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $34,578, a difference of 12.8%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $68,423, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $42,581, a difference of 0.53%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $37,884, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,719, a difference of 2.3%).
Income Metric | Pima | Menominee |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $34,578 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $79,563 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $68,423 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $37,884 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $42,581 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $33,894 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $47,907 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $79,358 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $76,903 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $51,719 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.7% |
Pima vs Menominee Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 125.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 118.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.1%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.3%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Menominee |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 16.4% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 12.7% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 15.3% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 17.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.5% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 18.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 23.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 25.0% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 27.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 16.8% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 37.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Average 5.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 17.2% |
Pima vs Menominee Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 109.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Menominee |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.4% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 11.3% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 10.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Poor 5.6% |
Pima vs Menominee Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Menominee |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 60.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Tragic 33.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 68.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 82.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 77.4% |
Pima vs Menominee Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 18.1%), currently married (35.9% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.30, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 0.70%), family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and single father households (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Menominee |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.5% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 42.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.30 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 9.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 42.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 51.1% |
Pima vs Menominee Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 58.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Menominee |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Pima vs Menominee Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and ged/equivalency (76.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Menominee |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 96.7% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 95.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 93.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 91.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Good 86.3% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 57.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 50.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 36.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 27.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Pima vs Menominee Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 116.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.56%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Menominee |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 27.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 52.3% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.0% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.8% |