Immigrants from Southern Europe vs Macedonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,049,905 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Immigrant from Southern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.081. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Southern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Southern Europe corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Macedonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.1%), median female earnings ($42,275 compared to $41,286, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,486 compared to $101,882, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,484 compared to $54,563, a difference of 0.14%), median male earnings ($59,217 compared to $59,522, a difference of 0.51%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,902 compared to $61,564, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.45%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.5%), births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.6%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Southern Europe and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 0.90%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.7%).