Houma vs Macedonian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,193,033 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.850. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.077% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 77.3 Macedonians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $107,074, a difference of 48.5%), median household income ($62,575 compared to $90,761, a difference of 45.0%), and per capita income ($32,996 compared to $47,573, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $59,522, a difference of 17.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $54,563, a difference of 23.0%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $49,893, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 90.3%), family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 88.3%), and single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 81.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 42.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 43.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 43.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 73.3%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 67.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 47.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.13, a difference of 1.4%), family households (65.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.81%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 114.5%), master's degree (7.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 111.1%), and doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 95.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 79.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 74.8%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.2%).