Burmese vs Macedonian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Macedonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Macedonians

Exceptional
Excellent
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Macedonian Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,419,471 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.401. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 3.0 Macedonians.
Burmese Integration in Macedonian Communities

Burmese vs Macedonian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $61,564, a difference of 15.5%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $90,761, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $107,074, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $54,563, a difference of 0.43%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $41,286, a difference of 8.8%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Income
Income MetricBurmeseMacedonian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$47,573
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$109,668
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$90,761
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$49,893
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$59,522
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$41,286
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$54,563
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$101,882
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$107,074
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Good
$61,564
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
28.6%

Burmese vs Macedonian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.4%), receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.56%), poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseMacedonian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
18.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
14.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
14.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
18.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.9%

Burmese vs Macedonian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseMacedonian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Burmese vs Macedonian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.23%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseMacedonian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
37.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.5%

Burmese vs Macedonian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.8%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseMacedonian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
47.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.13
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
27.9%

Burmese vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.5%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseMacedonian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
12.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
87.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
53.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
17.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
5.5%

Burmese vs Macedonian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.0%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.3% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseMacedonian
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
95.2%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
67.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
61.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
49.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
41.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Excellent
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Good
1.9%

Burmese vs Macedonian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Burmese vs Macedonian Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseMacedonian
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
21.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
45.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Fair
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%