Pima vs Macedonian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Macedonian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Macedonians
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,797
SOCIAL INDEX
85.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
47th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Macedonian Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,346,100 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Macedonians within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Macedonians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 27.5 Macedonians.
Pima vs Macedonian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $47,573, a difference of 55.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,074, a difference of 46.0%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $90,761, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,563, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,286, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $61,564, a difference of 21.8%).
Income Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Exceptional $47,573 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Exceptional $109,668 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Exceptional $90,761 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Exceptional $49,893 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Exceptional $59,522 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Exceptional $41,286 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Exceptional $54,563 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Exceptional $101,882 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Exceptional $107,074 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Good $61,564 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Tragic 28.6% |
Pima vs Macedonian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 157.1%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 136.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 111.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 19.6%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.8%), and single male poverty (20.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 55.9%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Exceptional 18.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Fair 12.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 18.9% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Pima vs Macedonian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 122.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 103.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Average 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 7.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Excellent 5.3% |
Pima vs Macedonian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 10.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Average 65.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 37.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Exceptional 85.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 85.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Pima vs Macedonian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 108.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 84.7%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 12.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 63.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Tragic 26.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Exceptional 47.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Tragic 3.13 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Exceptional 48.3% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Pima vs Macedonian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 87.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 53.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 17.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.5% |
Pima vs Macedonian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 80.6%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 78.6%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.0% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 95.2% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Exceptional 94.1% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Exceptional 92.9% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Exceptional 88.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Exceptional 67.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Exceptional 61.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 49.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Exceptional 41.4% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Excellent 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.9% |
Pima vs Macedonian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Macedonian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 80.9%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 66.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.0%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.5%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Macedonian |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 21.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Exceptional 45.4% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Fair 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Exceptional 16.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.4% |