Bhutanese vs Inupiat Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Inupiat

Exceptional
Fair
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Inupiat Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,340,688 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Inupiat.
Bhutanese Integration in Inupiat Communities

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $36,999, a difference of 34.8%), median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $47,281, a difference of 30.6%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $91,730, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $55,935, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $40,080, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $61,061, a difference of 18.4%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Income
Income MetricBhutaneseInupiat
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$36,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$91,730
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$78,841
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$43,000
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$47,281
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Good
$40,080
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Exceptional
$55,935
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$84,619
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$91,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Average
$61,061
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
20.8%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 117.5%), single male poverty (11.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 80.6%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 24.0%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 30.1%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseInupiat
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
16.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
22.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Good
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
20.1%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 163.8%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 144.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 121.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.2%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseInupiat
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
14.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.6%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 3.7%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseInupiat
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
79.9%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 130.1%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 86.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.9% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.63, a difference of 11.6%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseInupiat
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
67.8%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
32.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.63
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
4.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
41.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
52.1%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 242.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 38.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.0%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseInupiat
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
29.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
71.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
42.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 77.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 71.8%), and bachelor's degree (42.7% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.060%), 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.55%), and 8th grade (96.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.63%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseInupiat
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
54.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
47.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
25.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.3%

Bhutanese vs Inupiat Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 217.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 60.7%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Bhutanese vs Inupiat Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseInupiat
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
34.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
58.4%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%