Chickasaw vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,477,768 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.302. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 30.8%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $55,935, a difference of 25.0%), and median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $40,080, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $47,281, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $36,999, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $43,000, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 53.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (16.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 0.92%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 133.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 121.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 116.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 76.7%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 43.6%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 5.2%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 280.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 38.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (38.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 18.6%), bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 17.8%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 113.2%), ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 43.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 14.1%).