Luxembourger vs Inupiat Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Inupiat

Excellent
Fair
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Inupiat Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,743,601 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 16.4 Inupiat.
Luxembourger Integration in Inupiat Communities

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 32.1%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $36,999, a difference of 23.4%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $47,281, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $61,061, a difference of 0.15%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $40,080, a difference of 0.47%), and median household income ($86,418 compared to $78,841, a difference of 9.6%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$36,999
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$91,730
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$78,841
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$43,000
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$47,281
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Good
$40,080
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$55,935
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$84,619
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$91,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Average
$61,061
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
20.8%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 119.6%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 84.2%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 72.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 8.2%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.2%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Good
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.1%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 167.0%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 166.2%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 133.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 44.1%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
8.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
17.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
14.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.6%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 29.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 6.4%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
79.9%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 117.9%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 77.1%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (63.3% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 14.3%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
67.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
32.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.63
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
41.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
52.1%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 457.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 38.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 32.5%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
29.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
71.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
42.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Fair
6.2%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 54.0%), associate's degree (48.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 50.2%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and 7th grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
54.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
47.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
25.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.3%

Luxembourger vs Inupiat Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 181.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 61.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.40%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%).
Luxembourger vs Inupiat Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerInupiat
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
34.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
58.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%