Comanche vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,593,545 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.036. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 1.6 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 20.5%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $55,935, a difference of 17.7%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $40,080, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $47,281, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($38,088 compared to $36,999, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $84,619, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 51.2%), single male poverty (16.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.44%), poverty (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 120.2%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 106.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 36.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 38.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 91.9%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 41.9%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.5% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 5.0%), family households (63.5% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 191.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 32.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.4%), bachelor's degree (31.9% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 23.6%), and associate's degree (39.9% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (89.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.19%), ged/equivalency (83.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 198.6%), ambulatory disability (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.9%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.5%).