Pima vs Inupiat Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,827,426 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.826. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.340% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 340.5 Inupiat.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($63,262 compared to $78,841, a difference of 24.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $91,355, a difference of 24.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $61,061, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $84,619, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,935, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 72.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 64.5%), and married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.80%), receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 100.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 47.4%), and male unemployment (8.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.1% compared to 32.8%, a difference of 21.1%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and single father households (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.9% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 111.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 30.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 20.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 22.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 39.0%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.7%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 249.6%), ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.0%), and female disability (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.95%), disability age over 75 (55.8% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.6%).