Burmese vs Inupiat Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Inupiat
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Inupiat

Exceptional
Fair
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,695
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
244th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Inupiat Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,423,224 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Inupiat within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.365. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Inupiat. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 8.8 Inupiat.
Burmese Integration in Inupiat Communities

Burmese vs Inupiat Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $36,999, a difference of 40.6%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $47,281, a difference of 38.0%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $55,935, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $40,080, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $61,061, a difference of 16.5%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Income
Income MetricBurmeseInupiat
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$36,999
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Tragic
$91,730
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Tragic
$78,841
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Tragic
$43,000
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Tragic
$47,281
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Good
$40,080
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$55,935
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Tragic
$84,619
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Tragic
$91,355
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Average
$61,061
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
20.8%

Burmese vs Inupiat Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 131.8%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 70.5%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 70.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 10.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.4%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseInupiat
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
15.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Tragic
22.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Good
29.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
13.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
20.1%

Burmese vs Inupiat Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 173.2%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 146.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 43.6%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseInupiat
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Tragic
22.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
28.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
17.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
14.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
9.6%

Burmese vs Inupiat Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.0%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseInupiat
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
35.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
80.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
79.9%

Burmese vs Inupiat Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 139.1%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 97.7%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 67.8%, a difference of 3.1%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.63, a difference of 12.8%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseInupiat
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.8%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
32.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Tragic
42.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.63
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
52.1%

Burmese vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 208.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 35.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 71.5%, a difference of 26.4%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseInupiat
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Tragic
29.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Tragic
71.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Tragic
42.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
16.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
6.2%

Burmese vs Inupiat Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 101.6%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 94.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.9%, a difference of 0.82%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseInupiat
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.9%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Exceptional
98.9%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.9%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Exceptional
98.8%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Exceptional
98.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
98.6%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Tragic
54.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
47.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
25.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Burmese vs Inupiat Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Inupiat communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 230.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 68.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and female disability (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.1%).
Burmese vs Inupiat Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseInupiat
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
34.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
58.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.7%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%