Immigrants from Cuba vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,690,301 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Cuba communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cuba within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cuba corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($78,249 compared to $118,325, a difference of 51.2%), householder income over 65 years ($44,735 compared to $66,672, a difference of 49.0%), and per capita income ($34,910 compared to $51,368, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,374 compared to $52,503, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($33,291 compared to $44,066, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (20.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 112.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (17.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 71.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.55%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.7%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 15.4%), and male unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 47.4%), divorced or separated (15.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (44.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.26%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 124.6%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 81.6%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.93%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cuba and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 27.5%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.080%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.1%).