Immigrants from Lebanon vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,044,465 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 40.6 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,938 compared to $51,368, a difference of 9.4%), median family income ($110,159 compared to $118,325, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $44,066, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $66,672, a difference of 3.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $52,503, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.6%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 15.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 11.1%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.59%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.1%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and professional degree (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.9% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.8%).