Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,417,254 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.138% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 137.8 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $51,368, a difference of 8.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $66,672, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,010 compared to $107,258, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $44,066, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $52,503, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($54,478 compared to $52,960, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.42%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and single mother poverty (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.80%), family households (62.5% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.1%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 1.3%).