Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,955,610 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 19.3 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 66.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $114,407, a difference of 33.7%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $118,325, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $52,503, a difference of 3.9%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $44,066, a difference of 5.1%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $52,960, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 81.6%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 59.5%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.5%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 48.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 46.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 37.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 43.6%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.38%), family households (62.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.68%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.18, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 227.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 106.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 96.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 41.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 86.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 96.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 92.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.87%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.88%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.4%), hearing disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.8%).