Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,440,298 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.378. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.264% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 264.3 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $66,672, a difference of 3.7%), median household income ($93,602 compared to $96,964, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($114,826 compared to $118,325, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.77%), per capita income ($50,914 compared to $51,368, a difference of 0.89%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $52,503, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.1%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.53%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (62.0% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.64%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.9%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 16.5%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.1%).