German Russian vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,749,912 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.599. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 62.3 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $114,407, a difference of 28.0%), median household income ($75,856 compared to $96,964, a difference of 27.8%), and per capita income ($40,266 compared to $51,368, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $52,503, a difference of 15.0%), and median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $44,066, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 25.2%), single female poverty (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.14%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.86%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.4%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 55.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.2%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.2%).