Pennsylvania German vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,281,710 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.702. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.062% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 61.8 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,842 compared to $51,368, a difference of 35.7%), median family income ($91,763 compared to $118,325, a difference of 28.9%), and median household income ($75,814 compared to $96,964, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $52,503, a difference of 3.3%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $62,728, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 30.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 56.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 33.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.6%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.39%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.74%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 107.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 91.5%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 83.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 83.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.7%).