Northern European vs Immigrants from Turkey Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,295,127 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey within Northern European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Northern Europeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Immigrants from Turkey. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Northern Europeans corresponds to an increase of 97.2 Immigrants from Turkey.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($40,491 compared to $44,066, a difference of 8.8%), median earnings ($48,887 compared to $52,960, a difference of 8.3%), and per capita income ($47,698 compared to $51,368, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,678 compared to $52,503, a difference of 1.6%), householder income over 65 years ($64,658 compared to $66,672, a difference of 3.1%), and wage/income gap (28.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.42%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.4%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 44.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.6%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.4%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.9% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Northern European and Immigrants from Turkey communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.7%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.6%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%).