Shoshone vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,773,699 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Shoshone communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Shoshone within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Shoshone corresponds to a decrease of 95.3 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,072 compared to $44,068, a difference of 18.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,588 compared to $99,126, a difference of 18.6%), and median household income ($72,660 compared to $85,611, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income over 65 years ($53,681 compared to $59,151, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,720 compared to $54,268, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (22.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 43.9%), single male poverty (16.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.2%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 74.3%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 51.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.3% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.0%), divorced or separated (14.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and births to unmarried women (35.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%), family households (63.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.27, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 70.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 49.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.82%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.0%), master's degree (11.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 39.5%), and bachelor's degree (29.3% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.39%), high school diploma (88.3% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and ged/equivalency (83.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Shoshone and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (49.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.8%).