Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South America
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from South America
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,371
SOCIAL INDEX
41.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
200th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South America Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,131,154 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 17.7 Immigrants from South America.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($70,005 compared to $85,611, a difference of 22.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $54,268, a difference of 21.2%), and per capita income ($36,475 compared to $44,068, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $59,151, a difference of 10.1%), wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and median male earnings ($47,832 compared to $53,962, a difference of 12.8%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Good $44,068 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Fair $100,414 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Average $85,611 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Average $46,548 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Fair $53,962 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Average $39,643 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Exceptional $54,268 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Average $94,042 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Fair $99,126 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Poor $59,151 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 36.7%), single male poverty (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and single female poverty (26.3% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.85%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Fair 12.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Poor 9.5% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Exceptional 17.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Good 13.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Good 17.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Average 16.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Fair 16.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Average 16.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Excellent 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Excellent 28.5% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Fair 5.4% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Fair 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Fair 4.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Poor 4.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.5% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Good 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Good 7.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.4%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Tragic 33.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.8%), divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.030%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 65.6% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.27 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Poor 6.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Poor 45.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Poor 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Average 32.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 43.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 43.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 32.9%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 11.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Tragic 88.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Tragic 50.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Tragic 16.7% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 44.7%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.8%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.24%), ged/equivalency (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.83%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 96.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Tragic 94.8% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 93.8% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Tragic 92.6% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Tragic 91.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Tragic 90.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Tragic 87.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 84.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Tragic 63.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Fair 58.4% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Average 46.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Good 38.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Good 15.5% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from South America Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 68.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 62.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from South America |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Exceptional 46.7% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 2.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 16.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Excellent 2.4% |