Arapaho vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,456,095 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.246. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.184% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 184.3 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,068, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $94,042, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $99,126, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $59,151, a difference of 0.39%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 4.9%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $100,414, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 81.7%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.4%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 151.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 131.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 47.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 79.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 58.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 20.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 53.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 61.1%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 54.8%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.40%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 56.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 51.6%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 6.7%).