German Russian vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,635,818 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.223% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to a decrease of 222.6 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($45,673 compared to $54,268, a difference of 18.8%), median household income ($75,856 compared to $85,611, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $99,126, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.050%), median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $39,643, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $59,151, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 40.6%), single female poverty (23.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (9.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.30%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 27.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in family households (60.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.0%), currently married (45.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 34.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.92%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.7%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%).