Bahamian vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,181,784 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Bahamian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bahamians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.301% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bahamians corresponds to a decrease of 301.0 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,395 compared to $94,042, a difference of 24.7%), median household income ($69,726 compared to $85,611, a difference of 22.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($81,369 compared to $99,126, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,125 compared to $39,643, a difference of 12.9%), householder income over 65 years ($51,000 compared to $59,151, a difference of 16.0%), and median earnings ($39,735 compared to $46,548, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 34.7%), receiving food stamps (17.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother poverty (31.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 27.6%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.18%), family households (63.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.8%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 24.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.21%), 11th grade (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and high school diploma (87.5% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bahamian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.0%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.3%).