Filipino vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,982,724 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.136% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to a decrease of 136.0 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($138,397 compared to $100,414, a difference of 37.8%), median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $53,962, a difference of 37.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $94,042, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $54,268, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $39,643, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 73.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 49.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.1%), single father poverty (14.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and single male poverty (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 23.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.99%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 41.9%), births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 39.1%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 33.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.0%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 95.4%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 63.2%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.8%).