Ethiopian vs Immigrants from South America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,406,558 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Immigrants from South America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 29.6 Immigrants from South America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 12.8%), householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $59,151, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $39,643, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $54,268, a difference of 0.84%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $94,042, a difference of 3.0%), and median male earnings ($56,243 compared to $53,962, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.7%), receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.31%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in family households (61.2% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 7.2%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and married-couple households (43.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.6%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.1%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Immigrants from South America communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.72%).