Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Romania

Fair
Exceptional
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Romania Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,736,170 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.170% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 169.6 Immigrants from Romania.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $49,463, a difference of 37.4%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $94,222, a difference of 34.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $110,633, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,462, a difference of 21.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $55,522, a difference of 22.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Exceptional
$113,434
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Exceptional
$94,222
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Exceptional
$51,337
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Exceptional
$61,040
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$42,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$55,522
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Exceptional
$104,713
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Exceptional
$110,633
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Exceptional
$64,462
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 55.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 33.5%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.97%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Excellent
5.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.8%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Exceptional
83.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 32.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.6%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Exceptional
48.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Exceptional
27.9%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Poor
6.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 66.5%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 60.2%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
42.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 64.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.8%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Romania Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Romania
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Excellent
2.4%