Immigrants from Grenada vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,285,140 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.258. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.039% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 39.0 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 67.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $110,633, a difference of 29.3%), and median family income ($89,249 compared to $113,434, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $55,522, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $42,718, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $51,337, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 77.3%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 58.3%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.7%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 49.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 42.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.9%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.2%), and married-couple households (37.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (62.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 228.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 120.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 107.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 41.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 90.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 107.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 55.5%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.8%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), male disability (10.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.8%).