Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,515,952 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 222.7 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $104,713, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $55,522, a difference of 7.0%), and wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $64,462, a difference of 1.3%), median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $42,718, a difference of 2.9%), and median family income ($108,830 compared to $113,434, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.090%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.8%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.31%), family households (63.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.28%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 2.6%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (63.3% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and male disability (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.1%).