Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,286,673 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from Sweden communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sweden within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sweden corresponds to an increase of 94.8 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($55,582 compared to $49,463, a difference of 12.4%), median family income ($122,765 compared to $113,434, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,722 compared to $64,462, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,621 compared to $55,522, a difference of 3.5%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and median female earnings ($44,774 compared to $42,718, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.3%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.45%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.2% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in family households (62.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.66%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.67%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.20%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sweden and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.57%).