Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,821,238 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to an increase of 195.2 Immigrants from Romania.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $55,522, a difference of 8.9%), per capita income ($52,217 compared to $49,463, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $64,462, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $42,718, a difference of 0.28%), median household income ($94,846 compared to $94,222, a difference of 0.66%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $51,337, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 18.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.10%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.4%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.6%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and high school diploma (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.1%).