Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Navajo

Immigrants from Romania

Poor
Exceptional
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Romania Integration in Navajo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,466,398 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Immigrants from Romania.
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $49,463, a difference of 70.4%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $113,434, a difference of 59.8%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $94,222, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.9%), median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $42,718, a difference of 29.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $55,522, a difference of 31.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Income
Income MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,031
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Family Income
Tragic
$70,989
Exceptional
$113,434
Median Household Income
Tragic
$59,159
Exceptional
$94,222
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,999
Exceptional
$51,337
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,098
Exceptional
$61,040
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,046
Exceptional
$42,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$42,380
Exceptional
$55,522
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$66,529
Exceptional
$104,713
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$69,759
Exceptional
$110,633
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$47,722
Exceptional
$64,462
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
27.0%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 153.7%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 140.2%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 124.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 48.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.2%), and single female poverty (31.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 68.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty
Poverty MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
Poverty
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.3%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
31.7%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
40.2%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.4%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 102.2%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 94.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 31.2%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
Unemployment
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Tragic
7.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
18.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
29.0%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
16.1%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.7%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.3%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.4%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.6%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.2%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
32.1%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
64.8%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Exceptional
83.3%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 84.7%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 60.4%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.0%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
Family Households
Exceptional
66.4%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
48.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.65
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
27.9%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 21.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.3%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.3%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Poor
6.0%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 87.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 87.1%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 81.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level
Education Level MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Poor
95.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.0%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.1%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.2%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
32.6%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
42.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.1%

Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.1%).
Navajo vs Immigrants from Romania Disability
Disability MetricNavajoImmigrants from Romania
Disability
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
58.3%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.6%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Excellent
2.4%