British West Indian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,542,065 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.844. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.440% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to an increase of 440.0 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 44.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $107,378, a difference of 25.5%), and median family income ($88,987 compared to $110,137, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $53,990, a difference of 4.1%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $42,386, a difference of 5.2%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $50,225, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 60.8%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 9.3%), and single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 20.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 49.8%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.17, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 119.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 45.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 43.9%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 18.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.8%).