Immigrants from Fiji vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,851,924 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Immigrant from Fiji communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Fiji within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Fiji corresponds to an increase of 20.2 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 16.2%), per capita income ($42,694 compared to $48,747, a difference of 14.2%), and median male earnings ($54,958 compared to $59,278, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,952 compared to $107,378, a difference of 0.40%), median female earnings ($41,656 compared to $42,386, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,954 compared to $101,727, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.090%), female poverty (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.40%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and family households with children (30.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (46.2% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 74.9%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 73.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.3% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 20.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 49.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 46.8%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Fiji and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.92% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.27%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.7%).