Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Kazakhstan

Poor
Good
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,490
SOCIAL INDEX
72.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
115th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Kazakhstan Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,315,649 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 5.0 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Kazakhstan Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,747, a difference of 59.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,378, a difference of 46.4%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,015, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,990, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,386, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $101,727, a difference of 22.8%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$48,747
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$110,137
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$91,015
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$50,225
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$59,278
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$42,386
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$53,990
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$101,727
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$107,378
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Excellent
$62,292
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Fair
26.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 117.3%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 115.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 103.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.5%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 37.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 40.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Good
12.0%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Good
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Exceptional
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Excellent
15.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Excellent
11.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 160.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 114.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 108.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Average
5.3%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Poor
18.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Average
5.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.9%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Good
65.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
35.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Good
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Excellent
83.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 107.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 83.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.86%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
63.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Good
46.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
28.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 42.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 26.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
86.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
51.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 94.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 87.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and 5th grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Average
97.0%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Good
96.1%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Good
95.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Good
95.1%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
93.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
91.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
90.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Exceptional
69.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Exceptional
63.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
43.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
18.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 72.3%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 60.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Kazakhstan
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Average
47.4%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Excellent
17.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
5.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Average
2.5%