Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,390,387 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.282. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 1.3 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,933 compared to $91,015, a difference of 9.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $101,727, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,566 compared to $107,378, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,741 compared to $48,747, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and median female earnings ($44,198 compared to $42,386, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 12.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.6%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.15%), currently married (48.3% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 24.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (69.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.040%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.88%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.9%).