Blackfeet vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,072,182 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.929. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 204.6 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,695 compared to $48,747, a difference of 29.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,531 compared to $101,727, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $110,137, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $53,990, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $62,292, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 38.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 34.8%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 34.0%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.84%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 41.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 58.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 50.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.0% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.10%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.11%), and 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.0%).