Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,536,742 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 69.4 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $48,747, a difference of 23.2%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $59,278, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,018 compared to $101,727, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $53,990, a difference of 0.020%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $62,292, a difference of 2.5%), and wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 34.9%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 79.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 61.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (10.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 73.8%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 36.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.4%), no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 3.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 58.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.9% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and 11th grade (93.5% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 173.1%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.1%).