South African vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,265,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within South African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.110% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Africans corresponds to an increase of 110.1 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 7.7%), householder income over 65 years ($65,652 compared to $62,292, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,383 compared to $53,990, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($50,752 compared to $50,225, a difference of 1.1%), median female earnings ($41,825 compared to $42,386, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,160 compared to $101,727, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.9%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.79%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.13%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.67%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and family households (63.4% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.9%), professional degree (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (51.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 0.060%), bachelor's degree (43.6% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South African and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.29%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.2%).